.png)
Have you ever worked with someone who checks up on you so often you start to feel you’re under surveillance? Or, on the other hand, experienced the sheer delight of being trusted to handle your work without constant interference? I’ve had the (dubious) privilege of experiencing both. On one side, there was the micromanager whose favourite questions were “Have you done this?” and “Where is that?”. On the other, a leader who had complete faith in my abilities, no micromanaging required. The difference? It’s far more than a matter of personality—it’s a question of trust, mindset, and how people are inspired to deliver their best.
Drawing from my experiences—and concepts outlined in the book Leadership: Theory and Practice—this blog explores the stark contrast between a controlling manager and an empowering leader, their impact on team dynamics, and the valuable lessons each style imparts.
Micromanagement vs Leadership: Two Sides of the Same Coin
While both managers and leaders want results, their methods couldn’t be more different. The micromanager I worked with was a textbook example of task-oriented management, as discussed in Leadership: Theory and Practice. Their focus was firmly set on meeting targets and ensuring everything ran strictly according to their plan. It sounds efficient, doesn’t it? But when every update comes with a side order of interrogation, it starts to feel less like teamwork and more like doing school homework under a stern teacher’s gaze.
Their approach revolved around structure, organisation, and process—key traits of “initiating structure”, defined in the book as prioritising roles, tasks, and timelines. However, as effective as this might sound, the lack of trust and relationship-building felt stifling.
Contrast this with a leader I had the pleasure of working with. Their approach mirrored what Leadership: Theory and Practice calls “relationship-oriented behaviours”. They didn’t fret over every tiny detail; they trusted me to get things done and supported me when needed. Far from holding rigidly to control, they encouraged independence and fostered mutual respect. If they had concerns, they framed them constructively—asking questions like “How can I support you?” rather than nitpicking over task completion.
It wasn’t simply about getting jobs done—it was about building a culture of support, trust, and mutual respect. This balance between task focus and people focus embodies the principles of transformational leadership highlighted in the book.
The Ripple Effect on Team Morale
The difference in approach wasn’t just felt by me; it rippled through the entire team. Under the micromanager, the work environment often felt rigid and strained. Their endless check-ins came across as expressions of doubt rather than accountability. Unsurprisingly, this resulted in diminished confidence—not just for me but for everyone involved. There was no spark of collaboration or creativity, just an unspoken sense of “get it done, so they’ll leave us alone.”
In contrast, working under the leader felt liberating. Their belief in us wasn’t just freeing—it was energising. Team members felt encouraged to share ideas, seek help without hesitation, and bounce back quickly from failures. According to Leadership: Theory and Practice, transformational leadership fosters practices that encourage collaboration and raise performance. I saw this in action.
The impact of these leadership styles on team morale is striking. Based on my own experiences, I’ve mapped out how micromanagement and leadership influenced key aspects of team morale, including engagement, confidence, creativity, and adaptability.
This chart isn’t just theory—it’s a reflection of what I personally observed. Under the micromanager, morale dipped across all areas, as the constant oversight drained confidence and stifled creativity. By contrast, working under an empowering leader fostered trust, independence, and a real sense of ownership. The difference wasn’t just noticeable—it was transformative.
The Real Difference Between Manager and Leader
Reflecting on both experiences, it becomes clear that the gap between being managed and being led lies in trust. Where a micromanager relies on authority to keep hold of everything, a leader inspires confidence and ownership among the team.
The micromanager I worked with leaned heavily on a top-down approach, relying on "position power”, an authority-driven way to demand compliance. It got results—but more through pressure than true motivation. Meanwhile, the leader prioritised what the book calls "personal power”: earning influence through respect, trust, and meaningful relationship-building.
This key difference meant that the micromanager got the job done strictly by ensuring compliance—but only in a transactional way. On the other hand, the leader harnessed the team’s talents, fostering innovation and growth by treating every team member as not just a worker, but a valued part of a bigger picture.
Lessons Learned
Trust Over Control – Employees thrive when they feel trusted. Micromanagement might get short-term results, but trust inspires effort and creativity in the long run.
Balance is Everything – Effective leadership finds harmony between task orientation and supporting people, as highlighted in the behavioural approach.
Empowerment is Key – Leaders who encourage autonomy and creativity drive innovation and long-term growth, something micromanagement inherently stifles.
Leading Through Influence – True leaders rely on personal power like trust and inspiration, not just positional power and enforcement.
The difference between being managed and being led is as stark as being herded like sheep versus being coached like a winning team. Managers may get the job done—though often with a lot of bleating from the flock—but leaders? They make you feel like you can conquer mountains, slay dragons, and still make it home in time for tea.
Reflecting on my experiences, I’m grateful for the lessons from both sides. The micromanager taught me how not to sweat the small stuff (even when they made me sweat over it), while the leader showed me how impactful trust and empowerment can be. If I could choose, I’d follow the leader every time—the kind of person who knows how to guide without turning the workplace into an obstacle course.
Here’s the takeaway, plain and simple: if you’re in a position of leadership, trust your people. They’ll surprise you in the best way. And if you’re working under a micromanager right now, hang in there—you’re building top-tier patience (and probably some excellent internal comedic timing).
Leadership might not come with a manual, but it shouldn’t need a magnifying glass either. Trust, communicate, inspire—and you’ll not just lead a team. You’ll lead a movement. Now go out there and be the kind of leader people actually want to work with. Who knows? They might even bring you biscuits.
From the trenches of leadership,
Meg
PS - If you’d like to learn more about these leadership styles and approaches, I highly recommend picking up Leadership: Theory and Practice. It’s packed with insights that truly illuminate what makes someone a leader—and not just a manager.
Comments